<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philosophy and Microblogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markelikalderon.com/2008/09/02/philosophy-and-microblogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markelikalderon.com/2008/09/02/philosophy-and-microblogging/</link>
	<description>Philosophy and Text</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:56:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dbdkmezz</title>
		<link>http://markelikalderon.com/2008/09/02/philosophy-and-microblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4051</link>
		<dc:creator>dbdkmezz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markelikalderon.com/blog/2008/09/02/philosophy-and-microblogging/#comment-4051</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;What we cannot Twitter, we must pass over in silence&quot;, Ha ha! That&#039;s a great line :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would be interesting to see if philosophy twittering could get beyond aphorism and mocking. Certainly I&#039;m yet to do otherwise, my only philosophy related tweet so far was merely mocking a typo by David Chalmers, It&#039;s hard to see how anything philosophically significant could really be expressed in 140 chars, but I only started using twitter yesterday, so still holding out hope :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What we cannot Twitter, we must pass over in silence&#8221;, Ha ha! That&#8217;s a great line :)</p>

<p>Would be interesting to see if philosophy twittering could get beyond aphorism and mocking. Certainly I&#8217;m yet to do otherwise, my only philosophy related tweet so far was merely mocking a typo by David Chalmers, It&#8217;s hard to see how anything philosophically significant could really be expressed in 140 chars, but I only started using twitter yesterday, so still holding out hope :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
